Disclaimer: This essay has been written by a student and not our expert nursing writers. View professional sample essays here.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this essay are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of NursingAnswers.net. This essay should not be treated as an authoritative source of information when forming medical opinions as information may be inaccurate or out-of-date.

Nursing Essays - Therapeutic Relationship Patient

Info: 4722 words (19 pages) Nursing Essay
Published: 11th Feb 2020

Reference this

Tagged: gibbs reflective cycle


Within the context of healthcare one of the most important factors is the establishment of an effective therapeutic relationship between the nurse and

patient (Foster & Hawkins, 2005). The ways in which nursing staff and patients interact can be influential in terms of information transfer, provision

of psychological support, and may also provide some therapeutic benefits in themselves (Welch, 2005). Hence, there has been a renewed focus on the

importance of how nurses interact with patients in practice, in order to enhance patient outcomes (Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2008; Sutcliffe, 2011).

Understanding the fundamental components of this relationship and how to achieve these components in practice remains a vital aspect of nurse training and

continuing professional development (Ramjan, 2004; Perraud et al., 2006).

In accordance with the perceived importance of the therapeutic relationship, the aim of this paper is to provide an evidence-based review of how this

relationship may be used in nursing practice. This will be supplemented with a reflection on personal observations made by the author, utilising a

reflective model (Nielsen et al., 2007). The model in this case will be that devised by Gibbs (1988), which has been validated as a useful tool for

personal practice development and goal-setting in the clinical domain (Foster & Hawkins, 2005). This model emphasises a step-wise approach to

reflection, encompassing: description, feelings, evaluation, analysis, conclusion and action plan formulation (Gibbs, 1988). Therefore, this paper will

consider the therapeutic relationship from the perspective of a specified practice context experienced by the author, with a discussion of how practice can

be improved based on the best available evidence from the literature.

Reflection context

The main context of care that will be the focus of this essay is the elderly rehabilitation ward, where the author first encountered a number of issues

regarding the need for optimal relationships between practitioners and patients in practice. The goal of this ward is to assist elderly patients in

adapting to their functional capacities and lifestyle abilities, in order that they can achieve the maximum possible degree of quality of life in the

community setting following discharge (Routasalo et al., 2004). Consequently, numerous health professionals provide an input into the care pathway,

including physiotherapists, occupational therapists and physicians, in addition to nursing staff (Hershkovitz et al., 2007).

From the perspective of the author, there are several important aspects of this scenario that relate to the therapeutic relationship: the large increase in

personal responsibilities in terms of assisting patients with activities, the need to motivate and communicate effectively with patients to ensure that

they are able to remain psychologically motivated, and the need to coordinate personal clinical care activities with those of others to ensure the patient

journey is smooth (Siegert & Taylor, 2004). The remainder of this paper will consider the therapeutic relationship grounded within this practice

context, supplemented with personal experiences from this placement, in order to highlight these factors in greater detail.

Evidence-based reflection

Defining the therapeutic relationship

In order to fully appreciate the need for a therapeutic relationship it is important to define this relationship in a practice context. The term is often

used within the context of psychiatric or psychological therapy distribution in modern literature, although the aim of this paper is to consider the term

as a more general way in which nurses communicate and interact with patients to establish a clear clinical outcome (Bulmer Smith et al., 2009). McKlindon

& Barnsteiner (1999) suggest that the therapeutic relationship needs to be a two-way, reciprocal relationship at all times, involving nursing staff,

the patient and their family, where appropriate. There is a need to emphasise caring in this relationship, with positive communication and clear boundaries

of both personal and professional interactions (McCormack, 2004). Hence, the relationship between a nurse and patient should fit into the patient-centred

model of care, where patients are not only listened to within a clinical decision-making context, but are actively encouraged to participate in their own

care pathway (McCormack & McCance, 2006).

The therapeutic relationship encompasses three important domains of care: physical, psychological and emotional care (Pelzang, 2010). These elements may be

more profoundly encountered by nursing staff on hospital wards due to their prolonged exposure to specific patients and their in-depth interactions in the

patient care journey, when compared to other members of staff who may have less face-to-face time with individuals (Pelzang, 2010). Within the setting of

the elderly rehabilitation ward, many patients are transitioning from an acute or chronic care scenario to community care and require additional,

specialist assistance in doing so (McCormack, 2003). Consequently, nursing staff in this ward are exposed to patients for extended periods of time and need

to consider the holistic aspects of care in order to achieve successful rehabilitation (Cott, 2004). Therefore, the therapeutic relationship in this

context involves establishing the capabilities of the patient, working with the patient to achieve set goals, and ensuring that the psychological and

emotional aspects of chronic illness or disability can be managed effectively in the long term (McCormack & McCance, 2006).


In light of the definition of the therapeutic relationship within the context of rehabilitation, the remaining sections of this paper will evaluate the

core aspects involved in maintaining a therapeutic relationship, with this section focusing on communication between nurse and patient.

The specific clinical scenario the author has struggled with in the rehabilitation placement is when a patient has higher expectations than they should in

terms of their ability to perform tasks or live independently following discharge. Patients are obviously passionate in maintaining independence in the

majority of cases and this can cloud their judgement as to their genuine abilities and capabilities in functional tasks (Cott, 2004). While it is important

to acknowledge the feelings and ideas of a patient and act accordingly, it can be negligent of nursing duties not to act with the patient’s best

interests at heart (McCormack, 2003). Therefore, the nurse needs to maintain that their actions are guided by medical evidence and professional protocols,

as well as reflecting the need and desires of the patient (NMC, 2008).

Communication encompasses not only verbal communication with the patient, but is also reflected in body language and actions (Yoo & Chae, 2011). Having

an open body posture, including the avoidance of crossed arms, can help in establishing rapport, while maintaining eye contact and avoiding distractions

during conversations with patients can enhance the bond between nurse and patient (Brown & Bylund, 2008). Communication is also as much about relaying

information as it is about receiving information and therefore, nursing staff should be able to elicit patient concerns specifically and utilise these

appropriately without blocking these interactions with a one-sided approach to conversation (Yoo & Chae, 2011). The opposite is also true, whereby

overly expressive patients may limit the nurse-led component of the communication episode; both parties need to be good at communication for a perfect

mutual appreciation of ideas to occur (Sheldon et al., 2006). In practice this may be difficult to achieve, but the obligations of the nurse to facilitate

this process are a core component of the therapeutic relationship.

Communicating effectively with patients in the elderly rehabilitation setting was a massive responsibility and challenge for the author, as this was their

first encounter with such patients in this setting. The expectation of knowledge in this setting was high and it could be frustrating to patients who want

answers from a junior or inexperienced practitioner (McCormack, 2003; Leach, 2005). Hence communication needed to focus on establishing information,

sharing action plans and building general rapport that would enable the development of trust and a mutually beneficial exchange of ideas (Leach, 2005). The

author found this form of communication challenging to achieve on a routine basis within the rehabilitation setting, due to the need to balance a

motivational approach with a realistic form of communication regarding expected patient capabilities and outcomes. Hence, the reflective scenario will

focus on aspects of this particular communication episode as a component of the therapeutic relationship.


Empathy is a cornerstone of effective communication with patients and is defined as the ability to share or identify with the emotional state of the

patient (Brunero et al., 2010). If done effectively an empathic response to patient concerns can yield a sense of shared understanding, reinforcing the

notion that the patient’s concerns are being listened to (Kirk, 2007). By establishing an empathic response with a patient, practitioners often

remark that they are better able to connect with the experiences of the patient, allowing them greater insight into how they can help the patient (Brunero

et al., 2010). Therefore, empathy is a core component of establishing a meaningful therapeutic relationship with patients in all settings.

The nurse can develop empathic communication skills in a number of ways, including through specific communication skills training (Webster, 2010). This

training often emphasises the role of open-ended questions and body language within the context of empathy, whereby nurses should ask patients specifically

about their emotions and feelings during a clinical interaction (Stickley & Freshwater, 2006). Often the process of asking a patient how they feel

about a particular reaction is sufficient to allow them to relax and become more comfortable conveying these thoughts and feelings. On the part of the

nurse, it is important to reflect these responses back to the patient by further exploring these issues and offering an active listening approach, rather

than redirecting the focus of the conversation back to more clinical matters (Brunero et al., 2010). Although it has been argued that empathy is an

intrinsic quality, which some people possess, the representation of empathy in communication is important in clinical care and should be delivered through

verbal, non-verbal and emotional communication skills (Welch, 2005).

In the present scenario, the author was able to empathise with patients on the rehabilitation ward to a high degree and many patients were frank and open

about their emotional needs and worries regarding the rehabilitation process. Often the patients’ worries were highly emotive and this affected the

author such that the patient was regarded as an object of sympathy or pity in some cases due to their hardships. This made the author feel uncomfortable

during patient interactions for a number of reasons: firstly, because it was an emotional situation, and secondly because the expectations of the patient

with regards to rehabilitation were higher than expected and it was often difficult to address these in a controlled manner. Hence, the reflective

experience demonstrates a number of feelings in this situation, which reflect problems with the therapeutic relationship.

Trust and respect

One of the primary outcomes of the therapeutic relationship is to establish a caring and trusting relationship between the nurse and patient (Brown et al.,

2006). Trust is a concept based on respect and openness within this relationship and this often takes time to establish, acting as an extension of the

professional respect a patient may hold for a nurse and vice versa (Miller, 2006). Within the context of elderly care rehabilitation, nurses need to

establish a strong bond of trust as patients will often have to make compromises in terms of assisted living devices and acceptance of their functional

limitations when attempting to optimise their quality of life (Schmalenberg et al., 2005). Unless they trust the healthcare professionals involved in their

care they are less likely to adhere to recommendations or to accept help, reducing the potential positive impacts of nursing interventions (McCabe, 2004).

Establishing trust within a therapeutic relationship requires time and demands that the practitioner is able to manage their communication skills

appropriately to ensure the patient feels that they are listened to and involved in their own care (Brown et al., 2006). Both the practitioner and the

patient must be receptive to the idea of trust within the relationship in order for this to be achieved, which often involves addressing barriers to trust,

including suspiciousness of the intentions of healthcare professionals, poor communication, and mutual respect on a personal level (Miller, 2006). When a

trusting relationship is achieved there is a greater chance that patients will be receptive to clinical interventions and nursing input, at least when

delivered on a personal level (Wolf & Zuzelo, 2006). Equally, nursing staff can trust that patients will make informed decisions about their care and

will follow guidance, when appropriate (Schmalenberg et al., 2005).

Within the present reflective context, the author felt as though there was a distinct lack of trust in the therapeutic relationship, primarily due to the

fact that a patient would often wish for their expectations to be met without heeding specific nursing advice on several occasions. This was likely

secondary to the fact that the author found it difficult to convey these ideas in a sensitive manner, while addressing the concerns of the patient in an

empathic way. Hence, it can be perceived that the patient and nurse did not enter a trusting relationship, as communication between the two was suboptimal

(McCabe, 2004). However, on a more positive note, the relationships formed with patient during the initial days on placement were friendly and demonstrated

a degree of mutual respect, which is an important facet of the therapeutic relationship (Stickley & Freshwater, 2006). Hence, there were positive and

negative aspects to the therapeutic relationships formed in practice during this placement, according to a reflective evaluation.

To make sense of this situation, the author analysed these positive and negative factors within this context. What was clear to the author was that the

communication skills that had been utilised so far in therapeutic relationship building relied heavily on patient factors, rather than nursing input.

Hence, there was an imbalance in the way information was presented and received within this relationship, to the detriment of the therapeutic journey. The

reasons for poor communication and trust establishment stemmed from multiple factors, including the younger age of the author compared to patients,

relative inexperience on the part of the author, and the highly charged emotional nature of interactions in this setting. Therefore, it was clear that one

of the main factors that was missing in the therapeutic relationships was the projection of a strong professional identity, which could guide the patient

towards a suitable clinical outcome and would assist in developing the appropriate communication tools for the rehabilitation process.

Professional values

While it is clear that the need for the therapeutic relationship stems from a desire to form a constructive clinical partnership with a patient in a

specific context, there is also a professional responsibility to engage patients in this manner in practice (Chitty & Black, 2007). The Nursing and

Midwifery Council (2008) advocate communication, trust, dignity and respect during the treatment of all patients as a fundamental aspect of care delivery

and therefore establishing a therapeutic relationship can be considered a core aspect of all nursing practice (Fahrenwald et al., 2005).

However, within the context of effective nursing practice it is recognised that there is a need to respect the personal boundaries of the patient and to

act as a professional rather than a friend in most cases (Rushton, 2006). Professionalism in the context of rehabilitation care includes the need to be

realistic with regards to patient expectations, while ensuring appropriate levels of motivation and commitment to a therapeutic plan (Fahrenwald et al.,

2005; Rushton, 2006). For some practitioners, an overly empathic response to patients and their condition can lead to sympathy and warped clinical decision

making processes, often favouring the opinion of the patient over established guidance (Bulmer Smith et al., 2009). This is likely to have a detrimental

impact on the patient in the long term and should be avoided as a result.

Within the Gibbs reflective cycle (1988), the author has noted that one of the main conclusions that can be drawn from working within the rehabilitation

sphere is that maintenance of professional values and boundaries is essential to avoid becoming overly emotional or inappropriately involved in patient

care (Stickley & Freshwater, 2006; Baker et al., 2008). The author should try not to become too attached to patients during their care journey in order

to make an objective assessment of their capabilities and therapeutic needs, as relying too heavily on the opinions and desires of the patient can yield

unsatisfactory results in the long term, particularly when these go against recommended practice (Leach, 2005). By applying more rigorous professional

boundaries in the future, and focusing on explaining complex situations from a nursing perspective, rather than yielding to the patients’ wishes, the

author can improve their contribution to practice in the long term and enhance the patient journey through rehabilitation.


In summary, this paper has considered the personal experiences of the author within the context of a reflective practice episode in order to appreciate the

value and tenets of the therapeutic relationship in practice. The core components of the therapeutic relationship, as they relate to the present scenario,

have been discussed with reference to the evidence base in order to develop a constructive reflective episode reflecting a description of events, feeling,

evaluation, analysis and conclusion.

The process of reflection should yield a suitable action plan and in this case the author feels that they should engage with patients in a more

professional manner, ensuring that they maintain an empathic and understanding approach to care while maintaining nursing boundaries. In order to achieve

this, communication skills should be enhanced in the future, through attendance at specific communication skills courses, in order to become more

comfortable in managing potential conflicts or hostility. This should enhance the therapeutic relationship and ensure that future patients can be managed

in a manner that benefits all members of the relationship. Furthermore, it is important that the author is aware of how other colleagues maintain

professional boundaries and can direct their relationship accordingly in practice, and consultation with colleagues on this point would be a useful

learning tool. On completion of these tasks, the author should therefore feel better prepared to engage with patients in a meaningful way, ensuring that

trust is developed and that patients have an effective care process, in all areas of care.


Baker, C., Pulling, C., McGraw, R., Dagnone, J. D., Hopkins‐Rosseel, D., & Medves, J. (2008). Simulation in interprofessional education for

patient‐centred collaborative care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 64(4), 372-379.

Brown, D., White, J., & Leibbrandt, L. (2006). Collaborative partnerships for nursing faculties and health service providers: what can nursing learn

from business literature?. Journal of Nursing Management, 14(3), 170-179.

Brown, R. F., & Bylund, C. L. (2008). Communication skills training: describing a new conceptual model. Academic Medicine, 83(1),


Brunero, S., Lamont, S., & Coates, M. (2010). A review of empathy education in nursing. Nursing Inquiry, 17(1), 65-74.

Bulmer Smith, K., Profetto-McGrath, J., & Cummings, G. G. (2009). Emotional intelligence and nursing: An integrative literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(12), 1624-1636.

Chitty, K. K., & Black, B. P. (2007). Professional nursing: concepts & challenges. London: WB Saunders Co.

Cott, C. (2004). Client-centred rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disability & Rehabilitation, 26(24), 1411-1422.

Fahrenwald, N. L., Bassett, S. D., Tschetter, L., Carson, P. P., White, L., & Winterboer, V. J. (2005). Teaching core nursing values. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(1), 46-51.

Foster, T., & Hawkins, J. (2005). The therapeutic relationship: dead or merely impeded by technology?. British Journal of Nursing, 14

(13), 698-702.

Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: a guide to teaching and learning methods. Further Education Unit. Oxford Polytechnic: Oxford

Hershkovitz, A., Kalandariov, Z., Hermush, V., Weiss, R., & Brill, S. (2007). Factors affecting short-term rehabilitation outcomes of disabled elderly

patients with proximal hip fracture. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88(7), 916-921.

Kirk, T. W. (2007). Beyond empathy: clinical intimacy in nursing practice.Nursing Philosophy, 8(4), 233-243.

Leach, M. J. (2005). Rapport: a key to treatment success. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 11(4), 262-265.

McCabe, C. (2004). Nurse–patient communication: an exploration of patients’ experiences. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13(1),


McCormack, B. (2003). A conceptual framework for person‐centred practice with older people. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 9(3), 202-209.

McCormack, B. (2004). Person‐centredness in gerontological nursing: an overview of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13

(s1), 31-38.

McCormack, B., & McCance, T. V. (2006). Development of a framework for person‐centred nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56

(5), 472-479.

Miller, J. F. (2006). Opportunities and obstacles for good work in nursing.Nursing Ethics, 13(5), 471-487.

Nielsen, A., Stragnell, S., & Jester, P. (2007). Guide for reflection using the clinical judgment model. The Journal of Nursing Education, 46(11), 513-516.

Nursing and Midwifery Council (2008). Code of Professional Conduct. Available at: http://www.nmc-uk.org/aDisplayDocument.aspx?documentID=5982 [accessed 6 th October 2014]

Pelzang, R. (2010). Time to learn: understanding patient-centred care. British Journal of Nursing, 19(14), 912.

Perraud, S., Delaney, K. R., Carlson‐Sabelli, L., Johnson, M. E., Shephard, R., & Paun, O. (2006). Advanced practice psychiatric mental health

nursing, finding our core: The therapeutic relationship in 21st century. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 42(4), 215-226.

Ramjan, L. M. (2004). Nurses and the ‘therapeutic relationship’: Caring for adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45(5), 495-503.

Routasalo, P., Arve, S., & Lauri, S. (2004). Geriatric rehabilitation nursing: developing a model. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 10(5), 207-215.

Rushton, C. H. (2006). Defining and addressing moral distress: tools for critical care nursing leaders. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 17

(2), 161-168.

Schmalenberg, C., Kramer, M., King, C. R., Krugman, M., Lund, C., Poduska, D., & Rapp, D. (2005). Excellence through evidence: securing

collegial/collaborative nurse-physician relationships, part 2. Journal of Nursing Administration, 35(11), 507-514.

Sheldon, L. K., Barrett, R., & Ellington, L. (2006). Difficult communication in nursing. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 38(2),


Siegert, R. J., & Taylor, W. J. (2004). Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disability & Rehabilitation, 26(1), 1-8.

Stickley, T., & Freshwater, D. (2006). The art of listening in the therapeutic relationship: The role of the modern mental health nurse is becoming

more technical when, argue Theodore Stickley and Dawn Freshwater, what would really benefit patients is the often misunderstood art of listening. Mental Health Practice, 9(5), 12-18.

Sutcliffe, H. (2011). Understanding the NMC code of conduct: a student perspective. Nursing Standard, 25(52), 35-39.

Webster, D. (2010). Promoting empathy through a creative reflective teaching strategy: a mixed-method study. The Journal of Nursing Education, 49(2), 87-94.

Welch, M. (2005). Pivotal moments in the therapeutic relationship. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 14(3), 161-165.

Wolf, Z. R., & Zuzelo, P. R. (2006). “Never again” stories of nurses: dilemmas in nursing practice. Qualitative Health Research, 16(9), 1191-1206.

Yoo, M. S., & Chae, S. M. (2011). Effects of peer review on communication skills and learning motivation among nursing students. The Journal of Nursing Education, 50(4), 230-233.


Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

All Tags

Content relating to: "gibbs reflective cycle"

Gibbs' Reflective Cycle was developed by Graham Gibbs in 1988 to give structure to learning from experiences. It offers a framework for examining experiences, and given its cyclic nature lends itself particularly well to repeated experiences, allowing you to learn and plan from things that either went well or didn’t go well. It covers 6 stages.

Related Articles

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on the NursingAnswers.net website then please: