IMMUNOLOGY PRATICAL ASSIGNMENT
ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY
mODULE NAME: Clinical immunology
MODULE NUMBER: APS6004
MODULE LEADER: DR JULIA REY-NORES
STUDENT NUMBER: 20031761
BSc (H) BMS 3
2014/2015
Introduction
The history of immunoassay was developed by Roalyn Yalow and Solomon Berson in 1950 used the Radio-immunoassay (RIA) and they awarded in 1977 Nobel Prize because they developed RIA to detect and measure the level of glucose in the blood for diabetic patient. However, the technology was build up by replacing the radio-isotopes with enzymes to make colour generation that was in 1960. ]1, 2, 3[
Get Help With Your Nursing Essay
If you need assistance with writing your nursing essay, our professional nursing essay writing service is here to help!
More than 40 years, immunoassays use in different places, like laboratory medicine, hospitals and research to improve the health also for many purposes. In addition, immunoassay use in life science research to study the biology system by chase different, hormones, proteins and antibody. However, it use in industry to detect contaminants in food and water. Also, used as quality control to observe specific molecules used through product processing. ]1[
Nowadays, the immunochemistry technology develops assays to try eliminate as many dilution, mixing and measuring. Immunoassays are technique used to detect specific molecule. It’s rely on the ingrained ability of antibody that are bind to the specific structure of molecules. This techniques are quick and accurate it’s depend on the antibody and antigen that found in the blood and tissue fluids. ]1[
There are many type of immunoassays such as radioimmunoassay (RIA), enzyme immunoassay (EIA), fluorescent immunoassay (FIA), and enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). ]3,5[
In this report file I will focus on ELISA this technique that I used in the laboratory during two weeks to detect the antibody and the antigen. There is different types of ELISA:
- Direct ELISA
- Indirect ELISA
- Sandwich ELISA
- Competitive ELISA [3]
Direct ELISA
This method technique depend on the antigen that coated in the surface of plate and the antibody of the patient and conjugated enzyme. ]5[
Figure 1 shows steps of direct ELISA
The indirect ELISA
The technique used the micro plate coated with antigen. The primary antibody added to react with the antigen that fixed to the plate. Then washed away. Added enzyme conjugated secondary antibody anti-isotope antibody which binds to the primary antibody. After that washed away and added the substrate enzyme to produce the reaction colour that determined the amount of the antibody. ]3,7[
Figure 2 show the steps of the indirect ELISA
Sandwich ELISA
Sandwich ELISA is the technique that used to detect the antibody or antigen that are present in the patient blood. This technique also called capture method because it detect level of antigen between two layers of antibodies. The antigen to be measure in the technique should contain at least two antigenic epitope capable of binding antibody. Sandwich ELISA has many advantages for example high specificity, flexibility and sensitivity. ]3,8[
Figure 3 shows the steps of sandwich ELISA
The aim of practical:
- To achieve a grid experimental to detect the optimal detection and capture antibody titration, by using monoclonal mouse anti-rabbit IgG and polyclonal goat anti-rabbit IgG antibodies.
- To determine the concentration of unknown sample X and Y.
Materials:
- Coating buffer: phosphate buffer saline (PBS)
- Wash buffer: 0.05% Tween 20®in PBS, pH 7.4
- Diluent: PBS
- Blocking solution: 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS
- Antigen : rabbit IgG
- Coating antibody: Mouse anti-rabbit IgG monoclonal antibody
- Detection antibody :Goat anti-rabbit IgG – peroxidase conjugated
- Colour reagent .tetramethyl benzidine (TMB)
- Stop solution (1M HCL)
- 96-well micro plate
- Adjustable micropipette
Practical week 1
Methods:
This step was done by the lab technician to make the 96-well plate coated with antigen ready to the students because it’s take long time.
Figure 4 show the rabbit IgG antigen serial dilution by using 100µl coating buffer
Monoclonal and polyclonal antibody procedure in tables 1 and 2:
Procedure of Monoclonal antibody |
Procedure of Polyclonal antibody |
Added 100µl of diluents of buffer PBS from column 2-6 in the first plate |
Added 100µl of buffer PBS from column 8-12 in the second half of the plate |
Added 200µl of monoclonal mouse anti-rabbit IgG from A1well to H1 well |
Added 200µl of goat anti-rabbit IgG HRP to column 7 |
transferred 100µl by doing serial dilution mixed well from column 1 to columns 2 ,3,4,5,6 then discard 100µl from well 6 |
Transferred 100µl by doing serial dilution from column 7 to columns 8,9,10,11,12 then 100µl discard from colum12 (mixed well) |
Covered the plate and incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes. |
Covered the plate and incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes. |
Washed the plate three times with wash buffer
|
Washed the plate three times with wash buffer
|
Table 1
The final steps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2
Figure 7 shows steps
Week one: result
Graph 1 shows the results of mouse anti-rabbit IgG monoclonal antibody titration in different dilution
Result
Graph 2 shows results of goat anti-rabbit IgG HRP labelled antibody in different dilution
Practical week 2
Method:
- Step done by lab technician coated 20 wells overnight with 100µl/well of the capture antibody (monoclonal mouse anti-rabbit IgG ) and kept ready for use.( sandwich ELISA)
- Added 200µl of rabbit IgG to well A1 and A2
- Added 100µl of PBS diluents to wells from B to H in column 1and 2
- From A1, 100µl rabbit IgG was taken and added to B1 then serial dilution take place up to G1 then 100µl was discarded from G1
- 100µl of rabbit IgG was taken from A2 and added to B2 then continued the serial dilution up to G2 then 100µl from G2 discarded
- Well H1 and H2 was used as blank
- Added 100µl of unknown sample X to wells (A3 and A4)
- Added 100µl of unknown sample Y to wells (B3 and B4)
- Incubated the plate for 30 minutes at room temperature
- Washed the plate 3 times with washing buffer PBS
- Added 100µl of goat anti-rabbit IgG HRP labelled to all 20 wells
- Incubated the plate for 30 minutes at room temperature
- Washed the plate 3 times with Buffer BPS
- Added 100µl TMB substrate to all 20 wells
- Incubated the plate and protected from the light until colour develops
- Added 50µl stop reaction with (1 M HCL acid)
- Read absorbance at 450 nm by spectrophotometer
The result:
Graph 3 shows standard calibration curve of rabbit IgG
Graph 4 shows the equation log of concentration rabbit IgG
Calculation of samples
|
Table 3 shows the calculation to found the concentration of samples X and Y
Discussion
From the result that shows in graph one there are six curves of the monoclonal mouse anti-rabbit IgG with different serious dilutions(1:2000, 1:4000, 1:8000, 1:16000, 1:32000, 1:64000). From my result, the dilution 1:2000 is increase fast and it consumption more antibodies which is not recommended. The best dilution is 1:4000 because it gradually increase with less antibodies and this dilution can detect the lowest concentration of antigen and also can be used for more numbers of samples. However, the dilution 1:8000 it increase but is less than dilution 1:4000 it need more antibody, while the dilutions (1:16000, 1:32000, 1:64000) need more antibodies and not detect antigen in low concentration.
The graph 2 shows the result of polyclonal antibody and the graph has sex different curves with different serious dilutions ((1:2000, 1:4000, 1:8000, 1:16000, 1:32000, 1:64000) the first dilution 1:2000 increase sharp until concentration of 1000, then decrease slowly up concentration of 2000 so this dilution not recommended due to over opsonisation of antibodies. The second, dilution 1:4000 increased gradually and it need less antibody and can detect the lowest concentration of antigen so it is the optimum for the goat anti-rabbit IgG HRP labelled antibody. Third dilution 1:8000 is increase slow and require more antibody. The last three dilutions, 1:16000, 1:32000, and 1:64000 are not showing significant elevation when increase the concentration and cannot used because it not detect high absorbance of antigen.
The graph 3 shows the calibration curve of the known concentration to determine the concentration of two unknown samples X and Y. the graph 4 shows the equation make by log concentration of calibration curve to calculated the concentration of unknown samples.
During this practical I learned a lot of important things such as the best technique to choose the dilution of antibody and antigen detection. Also, to compare between the best antibody to detect antigen.
There are many factors that affect the result of ELISA like the incubation time should be 1 hour but we reduced to 30 minutes and this not enough for the reaction take place between antibody and antigen, manual washing cause insufficient washing and mixed with other micro plate wells. The pipettes some time not working due to some problem of tips.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the optimum monoclonal Mouse anti-rabbit IgG antibody concentration is 1/4000, while the optimum polyclonal Goat anti-rabbit IgG HRP labelled antibody concentration is 1/4000, and the concentration of unknown sample( X )is 287ng/ml and unknown of sample (Y) concentration is 41ng/ml. the ELISA is the best technique to detect the reaction between antibody and antigen.
Reference
1-Avrameas, S. (2006). Historical Background of the Invention of EIA and ELISA. Clinical Chemistry, 52(7), pp.1430a-1431.
2–Tulsidas G, S. (2002). HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY IN LIFE SCIENCES WITH REFERENCE TO IMMUNOASSAY IN MEDICINE. Health and Population, 3(25), pp.140-147.
3- Owen, J. et al. 2009. Immunology by Kuby. 7th ed. New York: W. H Freeman and Company.
4-Immunochemistry.com, (2014). Apoptosis, Caspases, Assay Development, ELISA Buffers, ELISA Detection. [online] Available at: http://www.immunochemistry.com [Accessed 26 Nov. 2014].
5-Accelero-bioanalytics.com, (2014). Home – Accelero® Bioanalytics GmbH. [online] Available at: http://www.accelero-bioanalytics.com [Accessed 27 Nov. 2014]
6-Wieslab.com, (2014). Wieslab Laboratory Services – Home. [online] Available at: http://www.wieslab.com [Accessed 27 Nov. 2014].
7-Pharmatutor.org, (2014). Articles | PharmaTutor. [online] Available at: http://www.pharmatutor.org/articles [Accessed 27 Nov. 2014].
8-Elisa-antibody.com, (2014). ELISA Antibody, protocol and troubleshooting. [online] Available at: http://www.elisa-antibody.com [Accessed 27 Nov. 2014].
Appendix
Result week one practical
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
2.1104 |
2.1292 |
1.9613 |
1.6637 |
1.3974 |
1.2574 |
3.2528 |
1.8449 |
0.9561 |
0.4939 |
0.2465 |
0.1338 |
1.8208 |
1.5499 |
1.4053 |
1.5323 |
1.0412 |
0.7042 |
3.4643 |
1.5967 |
0.8303 |
0.4028 |
0.2565 |
0.1613 |
1.4231 |
1.3054 |
0.5794 |
0.9972 |
0.8248 |
0.6163 |
2.8907 |
1.313 |
0.6298 |
0.3189 |
0.1761 |
0.1112 |
1.0608 |
0.9475 |
0.8302 |
0.6554 |
0.5236 |
0.3168 |
2.2198 |
1.065 |
0.5392 |
0.2867 |
0.1652 |
0.1013 |
0.7257 |
0.7008 |
0.6846 |
0.6725 |
0.5747 |
0.5967 |
1.6108 |
0.7602 |
0.6945 |
0.3432 |
0.1921 |
0.1128 |
0.513 |
0.4868 |
0.4624 |
0.3917 |
0.4104 |
0.3967 |
0.9931 |
0.5756 |
0.3218 |
0.17 |
0.1043 |
0.1606 |
0.3335 |
0.3444 |
0.3188 |
0.3414 |
0.3042 |
0.2611 |
0.6909 |
0.3377 |
0.1896 |
0.1087 |
0.0786 |
0.0585 |
0.0797 |
0.0856 |
0.0774 |
0.0677 |
0.0772 |
0.0886 |
0.1005 |
0.0566 |
0.0459 |
0.0473 |
0.0498 |
0.0589 |
Table 1 shows the result of the absorbance of monoclonal antibody and polyclonal antibody
concentration |
1/2000 |
1/4000 |
1/8000 |
1/16000 |
1/32000 |
1/64000 |
2000 |
2.0307 |
2.0436 |
1.8839 |
1.596 |
1.3202 |
1.1688 |
1000 |
1.7411 |
1.4643 |
1.3279 |
1.4646 |
0.964 |
0.6156 |
500 |
1.3434 |
1.2198 |
0.502 |
0.9295 |
0.7476 |
0.5277 |
250 |
0.9811 |
0.8619 |
0.7528 |
0.5877 |
0.4464 |
0.2282 |
125 |
0.646 |
0.6152 |
0.6072 |
0.6048 |
0.4975 |
0.5081 |
62 |
0.4333 |
0.4012 |
0.385 |
0.324 |
0.3332 |
0.3081 |
31 |
0.2538 |
0.2588 |
0.2414 |
0.2737 |
0.227 |
0.1725 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Table 2 the results of the absorbance of monoclonal antibody after subscription of the absorbance from blank
concentration |
1/2000 |
1/4000 |
1/8000 |
1/16000 |
1/32000 |
1/64000 |
2000 |
3.1523 |
1.7883 |
0.9102 |
0.4466 |
0.1967 |
0.0749 |
1000 |
3.3638 |
1.5401 |
0.7844 |
0.3555 |
0.2067 |
0.1024 |
500 |
2.7902 |
1.2564 |
0.5839 |
0.2716 |
0.1263 |
0.0523 |
250 |
2.1193 |
1.0084 |
0.4933 |
0.2394 |
0.1154 |
0.0424 |
125 |
1.5103 |
0.7036 |
0.6486 |
0.2959 |
0.1423 |
0.0539 |
62 |
0.8926 |
0.519 |
0.2759 |
0.1227 |
0.0545 |
0.1017 |
31 |
0.5904 |
0.2811 |
0.1437 |
0.0614 |
0.0288 |
-0.0004 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Table 3 shows the results of polyclonal antibody after subscription of blank
Result of week 2 practical
<> |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
A |
0.6084 |
0.5426 |
0.4306 |
0.419 |
B |
0.5699 |
0.4589 |
0.2425 |
0.2505 |
C |
0.5602 |
0.4504 |
||
D |
0.5085 |
0.4093 |
||
E |
0.4238 |
0.3164 |
||
F |
0.3004 |
0.2355 |
||
G |
0.1997 |
0.1794 |
||
H |
0.1242 |
0.1093 |
||
Table 4 shows the result of rabbit IgG absorbance and two unknown sample
Concentration IgG (ng/ml) |
1 |
2 |
mean |
mean- blank |
sample |
sample |
mean |
mean- blank |
2000 |
0.6084 |
0.5426 |
0.5755 |
0.45875 |
X=0.4306 |
X=0.419 |
0.4248 |
0.308 |
1000 |
0.5699 |
0.4589 |
0.5144 |
0.39765 |
Y=0.2425 |
Y=0.2505 |
0.2465 |
0.1297 |
500 |
0.5602 |
0.4504 |
0.5053 |
0.38855 |
||||
250 |
0.5085 |
0.4093 |
0.4589 |
0.34215 |
||||
125 |
0.4238 |
0.3164 |
0.3701 |
0.25335 |
||||
62 |
0.3004 |
0.2355 |
0.26795 |
0.1512 |
||||
31 |
0.1997 |
0.1794 |
0.18955 |
0.0728 |
||||
0 |
0.1242 |
0.1093 |
0.11675 |
0 |
Table 5 shows the steps of rabbit IgG and two unknown sample, mean then subscription of blank to make calibration curve and equation to get the concentration of sample X and X
Abbreviation
RIA Radioimmunoassay
EIA Enzyme immunoassay
FIA Fluorescent immunoassay
ELISA Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
PBS Phosphate buffer saline
BSA Bovine serum albumin
TMB Tetramethyl benzidine
HRP Horseradish peroxidase
1M HCL 1 molar of Hydrochloric acid
Log Logarithm
Y Absorbance
IgG immunoglobulin G
X Concentration
Result ignore
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below: